Go Back   Champions of Regnum > English > General discussion

General discussion Topics related to various aspects of Champions of Regnum

View Poll Results: Account-bound gear for transferred characters, Haven to Ra. How do you feel about it?
I'm okay with an account-bound restriction on transfer. 35 47.95%
I'm okay with an account-bound restriction, except I'd like to sell gear to merchants. 4 5.48%
I'd be okay with it if we make the restriction only for epic-level gear and above. 2 2.74%
I'd be okay with it if we make the restriction only for boss gear. 13 17.81%
I've already got toons on Ra, so I don't care about restrictions on gear after transfer. 10 13.70%
Hell, no! If NGD does this, I'm never playing this game again. 9 12.33%
No. I will not transfer my character under those conditions. 19 26.03%
I don't care what NGD does. I left this game a long time ago and I'm never coming back. 3 4.11%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-13-2018, 09:49 AM   #11
Eizaix
Apprentice
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 63
Eizaix is on a distinguished road
Default

[QUOTE=pelozo;1897287]Why, then, is Adrian saying they may need to bound items?



I believe it was a question to us players asking about our opinion of such a possibility, not a statement claiming that it is actually necessary for X reasons.

Still think this idea has been created only to get back at certain player/players because of personal antipathy against them for "having too much of something" or "not being my friend'', but that's just my opinion.
Eizaix no ha iniciado sesión  
Old 10-13-2018, 06:52 PM   #12
Roseythorns
Pledge
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 32
Roseythorns is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lebeau View Post
...butButBUT, if so, ALL such items on ALL servers should henceforth be account-bound. Fair's fair. What affects one rightfully should affect all. As is, the vote tally so far clearly indicates that these unrealistic restrictions are unacceptable to most. In my opinion, rightly so. There's no real need; if ppl $ell or trade or gift their gears, what of it? It's THEIR stuff, isn't it?

As Eizaix rightly points out, this has never once been a (mentioned) consideration before now: not for Tyr/Horus, not for Niflheim/Muspell, not for Piranha/Ra, not for Raven/Horus, not for Haven/Nemon, not mentioned even once in almost a 1/2 dozen mergers over almost a dozen years, so why THIS time? What's so entirely different, special, or unique here? Anything?
Honestly, Lebeau, I don't know. However, NGD is obviously a bit leary of character transfers from Haven to Ra. Perhaps they're not sure they caught all the gear duplicates (I'm pretty sure they haven't); perhaps they're unsure if boss gear was truly earned, given that GMs often helped realms beat certain bosses (saw that several times); perhaps they're just a little bit antsy about the idea because of the forum behavior of some of the residents of Haven.

They've not given any indication as to why (which you know). Just that they're a bit leary of it.

I, too, would like to know why. But I'm not holding my breath until they tell us.
Roseythorns no ha iniciado sesión  
Old 10-13-2018, 07:38 PM   #13
Lebeau
Banned
 
Lebeau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: 'B-F-Egypt', Virginia, U.S.A. (please pity & forgive us poor american fools!).
Posts: 605
Lebeau is on a distinguished road
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by halvdan View Post
...Haven players get shit service on Haven already, so transferring to RA even with some restrictions would be actually a huge improvement.
So is chopping off an offending appendage that is literally paining the living hell outa' ya', yet that's not my 1st choice, or the right way at all to go about fixing what's f-ed up.

Like I said before tho: To make the very best of all possible deals overall, you should never ever demand too much, but also, you should never ever demand too little either....

Lebeau no ha iniciado sesión  
Old 10-14-2018, 12:11 PM   #14
ieti
Count
 
ieti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Posts: 1,377
ieti is on a distinguished road
Default

Results of the poll are biased - this should be a single selection poll, but instead it was made multiselect. And now we have alot ppl who voted multiple things which are pretty not compatible with one another.

Why it was created like that? Maybe creator made a mistake or intentionally wanted to have such results...
__________________
RA | Ignis | Lilla My | Conjurer | EVIL IGNIS ROCK
Horus | Syrtis | ieti | Conjurer | INQUISITION | LONG GONE
ieti no ha iniciado sesión  
Old 10-14-2018, 12:31 PM   #15
Loque
Master
 
Loque's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 348
Loque is on a distinguished road
Default

This whole thread is invalid.
  • I'm okay with an account-bound restriction on transfer.
  • No. I will not transfer my character under those conditions.

These two directly contradict each other and it's a multi-poll. I can just select every option in the poll and it doesn't make any sense. Also it should be a public poll.
Loque no ha iniciado sesión  
Old 10-14-2018, 12:37 PM   #16
Anunnaki
Banned
 
Anunnaki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Inside a house...
Posts: 280
Anunnaki is on a distinguished road
Default

Objective of this thread is to make those 2 options on the same levels :
  • I'm okay with an account-bound restriction on transfer.
  • No. I will not transfer my character under those conditions.

Good luck
Anunnaki no ha iniciado sesión  
Old 10-14-2018, 05:38 PM   #17
usuario_del_foro
Apprentice
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 51
usuario_del_foro is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by halvdan View Post
But oh, Haven players get shit service on Haven already, so transferring to RA even with some restrictions would be actually a huge improvement.
Thats exactly what I think. Will have to sacrifice some stuff (have warriors in different accounts, wont be able to share stuff), but at least I will log and have something to do. Haven is unplayable.
__________________
D i o s
usuario_del_foro no ha iniciado sesión  
Old 10-14-2018, 05:48 PM   #18
Eizaix
Apprentice
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 63
Eizaix is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by usuario_del_foro View Post
Thats exactly what I think. Will have to sacrifice some stuff (have warriors in different accounts, wont be able to share stuff), but at least I will log and have something to do. Haven is unplayable.
Well I don't understand why any such or similar restrictions would be necessary in any circumstances.
To be real the people from smaller servers have suffered enough already, would be like punishing us even more by creating such unfair conditions
Eizaix no ha iniciado sesión  
Old 10-14-2018, 07:29 PM   #19
Lebeau
Banned
 
Lebeau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: 'B-F-Egypt', Virginia, U.S.A. (please pity & forgive us poor american fools!).
Posts: 605
Lebeau is on a distinguished road
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by usuario_del_foro View Post
...Will have to sacrifice some stuff (have warriors in different accounts, wont be able to share stuff), but at least I will log and have something to do. Haven is unplayable.
Ah, but will you? Only if NGD insists on making it so. It doesn't have to be this way. If they wanted, they could freely allow transfers, or commit to future server merges without any restrictions at all. What many have been asking (in several threads now) is the exact what & why? Sure, players have offered various opinions (& many valid), but NGD has remained utterly silent on these particulars. It's high time they ponied up, to get it all out there & on display, allowing all of us to freely discuss the merits & flaws of each possible scenario....

Lebeau no ha iniciado sesión  
Old 10-14-2018, 07:43 PM   #20
halvdan
Master
 
halvdan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Kogoruhn
Posts: 319
halvdan is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eizaix View Post
Well I don't understand why any such or similar restrictions would be necessary in any circumstances.
It's probably just that NGD wants to prevent huge influx of decent/op stuff to Ra. They're probably afraid it could cut their revenues from boxes.
Besides that
  • Boss item trade
  • crossrealm trade - while probably not prohibited, NGD will certainly not support this for the reason mentioned above
I'm not saying I agree with these reasons, just they may see these as an obstacle.
__________________
A better world.
halvdan no ha iniciado sesión  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
NGD Studios 2002-2016 © All rights reserved